← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/32471/2021dismissed

Manjit Singh v. State Of Punjab And Others

2021-08-12Mrs. Justice Meenakshi I. Mehta2 pages

CRM-M No.32471 of 2021 ...1...

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH Sr.No.108 CRM-M No.32471 of 2021 Date of Decision: 12th August, 2021.

Manjit Singh

...Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab & Others

...Respondents

(Heard through Video-Conferencing) CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA

Present:

Ms. Ruby Kaur, Advocate, for the petitioner.

* * * * MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA, J.

(ORAL) After arguing for a while, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the instant petition, while submitting that the petitioner would be moving a fresh representation to respondent No.2-Senior Superintendent of Police, Hoshiarpur, exclusively praying therein for the protection of his life and liberty only and she further prays that the said respondent be directed to look into and take appropriate action on the same within some specific time frame.

Ms. Samina Dhir, learned Deputy Advocate General, Punjab, who has joined the proceedings on behalf of respondents No.1 to 3 in this case in pursuance of the copies of this petition having been sent to the respondent-State in advance, has no objection to the afore-said submission/prayer of learned counsel for the petitioner. SEEMA SHARMA 2021.08.12 16:44 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court, Chandigarh

CRM-M No.32471 of 2021 ...2...

Resultantly, the petition in hand is hereby dismissed for having been withdrawn, with the observations that in case, the petitioner moves any fresh representation to respondent No.2 specifically restricting his prayer therein to the protection of his life and liberty only, then the said respondent shall look into the same and if the petitioner would be found to be genuinely deserving the protection of his life and liberty, then he would take appropriate action strictly in accordance with law, in the given set of facts and circumstances of the matter, preferably within a period of ten days. (MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA) JUDGE 12.08.2021.

seema Whether speaking/reasoned?

No Whether Reportable?

No SEEMA SHARMA 2021.08.12 16:44 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court, Chandigarh