Umrao Singh v. State Of Haryana
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH CRM-M-27697-2020 (O&M) Date of decision: 17.09.2020 Umrao Singh
...Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana .....Respondent
****
! " " "
The petitioner has filed this petition under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. for grant of regular bail in case FIR No. 351 dated 04.08.2019 registered under Sections 148, 149, 323, 341, 427 and 302 IPC, at Police Station Pataudi, District Gurugram.
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the alleged recovery was a thick stick (Dang) from the petitioner and there is no specific injury attributed to the petitioner. He further draws the attention of this Court to Post Mortem Report (Annexure P-2) of deceased-Jagdhir @ Bhohli, wherein as per the opinion of the Medical Officer, injuries No.1 to 4 had been caused with the sharp-edged weapon, whereas injuries No.4 and 5 were caused with the blunt weapon. It was further opined that the death of the deceased was caused with the injuries received from the sharp-edged MANGAL SINGH 2020.09.17 05:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
weapon.
On the instructions from ASI Subhash Chander, learned State counsel has not disputed the factum of the recovery effected from the petitioner and the death of Jagdhir @ Bhohli emanated from the injuries caused with sharp-edged weapon. He further states that out of 25 prosecution witnesses, only 2 witnesses have been examined so far. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties. The petitioner has been in custody since 05.08.2019. Though the case is at the stage of evidence, yet the trial will take time to conclude, especially due to prevailing situation of Covid-19. Thus, no useful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner behind the bars. # $
$ "
" % % & %%$
% "%
% %
% '(
"
17.09.2020 ) ' !
"* +', )
%* +', MANGAL SINGH 2020.09.17 05:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document