Shingara Singh v. M/S Harish Girdhar & Sons & ANR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH CRR-925 of 2016 (O&M) Date of Decision: 17.10.2018 Shingara Singh ....Petitioner
Versus
M/s Harish Girdhar & sons and another ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMENDRA JAIN Present:- Mr. Sahil Khunger, Legal Aid Counsel, for the petitioner. Mr. A.K. Sama, Advocate, for respondent No.1. Mr. Harpreet Multani, AAG, Punjab.
RAMENDRA JAIN, J. (ORAL) Learned legal-aid counsel submits that CRR-1096 of 2016 has also been filed by the petitioner through a private counsel against the same judgment, which has been challenged in the instant revision. In view of above, instant revision is dismissed as two revisions against the single judgment are not maintainable. However, this order shall not be res judicata for the petitioner to argue on merit in that revision. Registry is directed to consign revision to the record room being not maintainable.
(RAMENDRA JAIN) October 17, 2018 JUDGE R.S.
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No RAVINDER SINGH 2018.10.26 16:54 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document