Kamal Kumar v. State Of Haryana & ORS

CRWP-1650-2015

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CRWP-1650-2015 Date of Decision: February 5, 2016 Kamal Kumar

...Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana and others

...Respondents

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARESH KUMAR SANGHI

Present:

Mr. Vijay Kumar, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Sanjay Kumar Saini, AAG, Haryana.

1.

Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

2.

To be referred to the Reporters or not?

3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

NARESH KUMAR SANGHI, J (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of conciliation between the private parties, he does not want to press this petition at this stage.

Learned counsel for the State has no objection to the PRASHANT KAPOOR 2016.02.08 15:35 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document

CRWP-1650-2015 above prayer.

Ordered accordingly.

(NARESH KUMAR SANGHI) JUDGE February 5, 2016 Pkapoor PRASHANT KAPOOR 2016.02.08 15:35 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document