Shamshad v. State Of Haryana & ORS




    
       Date of decision: 21st January, 2016  Shamshad  Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana and others  Respondents  

   

 !
  !
 1.

Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment?

2.

Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

Present:

Mr. R.K. Bagga, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Deepak Sabharwal, Addl. Advocate General, Haryana.

 !
"#  $ Learned State counsel has filed reply by way of affidavit of Sher Singh, Superintendent of Prison, District Prison, Karnal. The same is taken on record.

In the light of averments of the learned State counsel that on account of election code that has been imposed, they cannot consider such prayer of the petitioner and undertakes to dispose off the representation of the petitioner within a period of one month after the code becomes inoperative.

RATTAN PAL SINGH 2016.01.22 16:06 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court



    In view of the stand of the State, the present petition stands disposed off.

#  !
$   %&'%()"*
 RATTAN PAL SINGH 2016.01.22 16:06 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court