Ashok Kumar v. State Of Haryana And ORS




    
        Date of decision: 21st January, 2016  Ashok Kumar

Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana and others

Respondents      !

 "
  "
 1.

Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment?

2.

Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

Present:

Mr. Sandeep Gahlawat, Advocate for Mr. M.L. Singla, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Deepak Sabharwal, Addl. Advocate General, Haryana for respondents No.1 to 3.

Mr. D.S. Nain, Advocate for respondents No.4 to 6.

 "
#$ !% Alleged detenue Pooja has come present in pursuance of the previous orders and has again emphatically highlighted her stand that she wants to stay with petitioner Ashok Kumar. Since it is admitted by learned counsel for the two sides, Mr. Sandeep Gahlawat, Advocate representing the petitioner as well as Mr. D.S. Nain, Advocate for the private respondents No.4 to 6 and could not be controverted by Mr. Deepak Sabharwal, Addl. Advocate RATTAN PAL SINGH 2016.01.21 13:21 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court



   General, Haryana representing the State that the girl is a major and thus, keeping in view this situation, this Court cannot in any manner issue directions as it is the personal choice of the girl and her right to life and personal liberty and therefore, in the light of the same, necessary directions are issued to Nari Niketan, Karnal that the girl be immediately released and she will be at liberty to accompany anyone she likes as per her desire and needs.

The petition stands disposed off as such.

$  "
%   &'(&)*# +
 RATTAN PAL SINGH 2016.01.21 13:21 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court