Lilu Ram v. State Of Haryana And ORS.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH **** 662-3 CWP-4843-2009 Date of Decision:09.09.2025 LILU RAM

...Petitioner

Vs.

STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS.

...Respondents

CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present:- Mr. Madan Pal, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Suneel Ranga, DAG Haryana *** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL) 1.

The petitioner through instant petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India is seeking setting aside of order dated 03.09.2008 whereby he was terminated despite 13 years' service. 2.

Notice of motion was issued on 27.03.2009 and operation of order of termination was stayed.

3.

Learned State counsel submits that petitioner passed away in November' 2011. The petitioner in view of interim order of this Court continued to work till November' 2011. He completed 15 years' service. 4.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner's son was not considered for any financial benefits on account of pendency of instant petition. He may be granted liberty to approach authorities to seek financial assistance in accordance with policy. 5.

In the backdrop, disposed of with the aforesaid liberty. DEEPAK BISSYAN 2025.09.09 18:12 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CWP-4843-2009 -26.

Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. (JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE 09.09.2025 Deepak DPA Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No DEEPAK BISSYAN 2025.09.09 18:12 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document