High Court of Punjab and HaryanaFAO(FC)/336/2016dismissed

Bharat v. Anu

2016-09-30Mrs. Justice Raj Rahul Garg1 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Revn. No. F-336 of 2016 Date of decision:- 30.09.2016 Bharat

...Petitioner

Versus

Anu

...Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI Present:- Mr. Jitender Kaushik, Advocate for the petitioner.

RITU BAHRI J.(Oral) Challenge in the present petition is to the order dated 22.08.2016 passed by learned District Judge Family Court, Karnal vide which the application filed by the respondent was allowed and petitioner was directed to pay a sum of Rs.6,000/- to the respondent as an interim maintenance per month from the date of filing of petition.

A bare perusal of impugned order shows that the petitioner has admitted that he was having annual income of Rs.1,84,500/- and Rs.1,68,200/- respectively for the year 2012-13 and 2013-14 i.e roughly Rs.15,000/-Rs.16,000/- per month. Further he is the registered owner of car and TATA LCV. Besides this, he is having two shops of spare parts.

The order dated 22.08.2016 passed by learned District Judge Family Court, Karnal does not require any interference by this Court at this stage. The petition stands dismissed.

30.09.2016 ( RITU BAHRI ) G Arora JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether reportable No GAURAV ARORA 2016.10.04 10:16 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document