High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/33137/2021disposed of

Shiba Alias Aarti v. State Of Haryana And Others

2021-08-17Mrs. Justice Meenakshi I. Mehta2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH Sr.No.108 CRM-M No.33137 of 2021 Date of Decision: 17.08.2021 Shiba @ Aarti

...Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana and others

...Respondents

(Heard through Video-Conferencing) CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA

Present:

Mr. Rajesh Bansal, Advocate, for the petitioner.

* * * * MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA, J.

(ORAL) After arguing for a while, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the instant petition while submitting that so far as the prayer of the petitioner qua the protection of her own as well as her husband's lives and liberty is concerned, she would be moving a fresh representation to respondent No.3 exclusively seeking the said relief therein and as regards the remaining relief as sought in the present petition, she would be availing the alternative efficacious remedy, as may be permissible to her under law, for this purpose. He further prays that the said respondent be directed to look into and take appropriate action on the fresh representation, as intended to be moved by the petitioner, within some specific time frame. Mr. S.S. Pannu, learned Deputy Advocate General, Haryana, NEETU RANI 2021.08.17 17:19 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document PHHC

CRM-M No.33137 of 2021 -2- .....

has joined the proceedings on behalf of all the respondents in this case, in pursuance of the copies of this petition having been sent to the respondent-State in advance and he apprises the Court that during the inquiry as conducted by the concerned Deputy Superintendent of Police, the allegations levelled by the present petitioner against respondents No.4 to 10 have been found to be baseless and false. However, he has no objection to the above-said submission/prayer of learned counsel for the petitioner.

Resultantly, the petition in hand is hereby dismissed for having been withdrawn, with the observations that in case, the petitioner moves any fresh representation to respondent No.3-Superintendent of Police, Panipat, specifically restricting her prayer therein to the protection of her own and her husband's lives and liberty only, then the said respondent shall look into the same and if the petitioner and her husband would be found to be genuinely deserving the protection of their lives and liberty, then he would take appropriate action strictly in accordance with law, in the given set of facts and circumstances of the matter, preferably within a period of 10 days. (MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA) JUDGE 17.08.2021 neetu Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether Reportable No NEETU RANI 2021.08.17 17:19 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document PHHC