Avtar Singh v. State Of Punjab And Another
CRM-M-29308-2022 -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-29308-2022 Date of Decision: July 12, 2022 Avtar Singh .....Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab and another ......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAJESH BHARDWAJ
Present:
Mr.SPS Sidhu, Advocate for the petitioner.
........
RAJESH BHARDWAJ, J.(ORAL) Instant petition has been filed under Section 439(2) Cr.P.C. read with Section 482 Cr.P.C. praying for cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to respondent No.2 in case FIR No.43, dated 09.10.2021, under Sections 406, 498A, 420, 120-B IPC, registered at Police Station NRI, Ludhiana, District Ludhiana, by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Ludhiana, and to set aside the order dated 25.05.2022 vide which the application filed by the petitioner for cancellation of bail has been dismissed. Counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that he approached this Court earlier also wherein this Court disposed of his petition with liberty to the petitioner to approach the Court of learned Additional Sessions Judge, Ludhiana, vide order dated 14.02.2022. He submits that in pursuance of the same, he approached the Court of learned Additional Sessions Judge, Ludhian, however, his request was declined vide order dated 25.05.2022. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record.
MEENU 2022.07.13 17:25 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment
CRM-M-29308-2022 -2At the outset it is apparent that investigation is completed and the challan is already presented against respondent No.2-accused. Besides this, there is nothing on record that respondent No.2 has misused the concession of the bail granted to her. Thus, there are no supervening circumstances for consideration of the prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioner. In the overall facts and circumstances, the Court finds no infirmity in the view taken by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Ludhiana. Resultantly, the petition being devoid of any merit is hereby dismissed.
July 12, 2022 ( RAJESH BHARDWAJ ) meenuss JUDGE 1.
Whether speaking/reasoned ?
Yes/No 2.
Whether reportable ?
Yes/No MEENU 2022.07.13 17:25 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment