Karan Ohri v. Monika & ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CRR(F)-437-2016 Date of Decision:- 11.01.2017 Karan Ohri ....Petitioner

Versus

Monika and another ....Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI

Present:

Ms. Rajni, Advocate for Mr. Naveen Batra, Advocate, for the petitioner. **** RITU BAHRI, J. (Oral) Petitioner has come in revision petition against order dated 28.09.2016, passed by learned District Judge, Family Court, Faridkot, vide which the application of the respondents for ad-interim maintenance was allowed and they have been granted maintenance @ `3,000/- per month each.

Learned counsel for the petitioner has argued that on account incident in the matrimonial dispute, the petitioner has suffered fractures on the arm and is unable to earn his livelihood. After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner, going through the impugned order, this Court is of the considered view that the learned District Judge, Family Court, Faridkot, has rightly assessed the income of the petitioner and passed the impugned order. The plea of actual earning will be decided at the stage of final arguments in the application filed under Section 125 Cr.P.C. At this stage, as ground for interference in the impugned order is made out, therefore, the present petition is hereby dismissed.

January 11, 2017 ( RITU BAHRI ) naresh.k JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether reportable No Naresh Kumar 2017.02.06 10:19 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh