Balwinder Kaur v. State
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRWP No.105 of 2016 (O&M) Date of decision: March 14, 2016 Balwinder Kaur
...Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab
...Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJIT SINGH
Present:
By post.
Mr.P.S.Grewal, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab for the respondent-State.
**** INDERJIT SINGH, J.
The application received through E-mail in the office of Hon'ble Chief Justice has been taken on judicial side. Notice of motion was issued in this case and learned State counsel was directed to get the matter inquired through the concerned Station House Office and to submit report before this Court. It was also ordered that if the detenue is found to be detained illegally, then he be produced in the Court on the date fixed. Today, learned State counsel filed reply by way of affidavit of DSP (Rural) Ferozepur.
It is stated in the reply that on the basis of same allegations, the petitioner had moved an application before police authorities. The enquiry was conducted and it is found that petitioner VINEET GULATI 2016.03.30 10:31 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh
CRWP No.105 of 2016 -2and her husband had some dispute regarding a plot with Ranjit Singh. It was transpired that husband of the petitioner/complainant is still present at his house and on 14.01.2016, he was seen by people while he was present in Gurudwara Sahib of village. It is also stated that statements of so many villagers are also placed on record. In view of the reply, I find that detenue Satnam Singh husband of the petitioner is residing in the village and he was seen by the villagers while doing sewa in the Gurudwara Sahib and he has not been illegally detained.
In view of the above discussion, no further action is required in the present criminal writ petition and therefore, the same stands disposed of accordingly.
March 14, 2016 (INDERJIT SINGH) Vgulati JUDGE VINEET GULATI 2016.03.30 10:31 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh