Asru v. State Of Haryana And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

CRM-M-8330-2018 Date of decision: 20.09.2018 Asru ..... Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana and others ..... Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMENDRA JAIN PRESENT: Mr. Pankaj Kaushik, Advocate for Mr. Saleem Ahmed, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Arjun Singh Yadav, AAG, Haryana.

RAMENDRA JAIN, J. (ORAL) Reply filed by learned State counsel is taken on record. Office to tag the same at the appropriate place. As per office report, notices to respondents No. 4 to 6 could not be issued as learned counsel for the petitioner has not complied with the previous order dated 10.07.2018.

Learned State counsel submits that the instant petition has rendered infructuous on account of filing of final report under Section 173(2) Cr.P.C. against one Aslam, declaring co-accused, Fajru, Wahidan, Kamru, Hakmudeen and Sakunat as innocent, during investigation. In view of the above, the instant petition is dismissed on following two counts:- (i) as having rendered infructuous; and (ii) for want of prosecution as well for not complying with the previous order dated 10.07.2018.

September 20, 2018 ( RAMENDRA JAIN ) rishu JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No RISHU KATARIA 2018.09.25 17:15 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document