Beg Raj v. Charan Singh And Others

     

    

!"

#$%$!&'

!( )* + ,-  
 

.%/       

 '

01 2/ 2 2  2 

 
    
    

      
  

 

!"

#  $ %%%% 2  2

/

& '  

 

                 ()*+(**)  #  &))  ,   &-..  $     

 ' # / 0  1 ' # 12 
  

( ((+(**( 

 

     #

# , 45!+&!5!.*&-'$   
# 

  

   # .6* 

  ,

47 #  

&      $  

$ #8   # 0#   #



 # #

    #

'

9# 8

#   

   9#  $ 

&  #     8    :  
#   ;    /"  4  6--<*(  

  

#  (=-<66=<6*>!  "

  

6 /

    ' # 

#!

 



    

    

  !"#$$ %             &    

  

 

 

   ' 

"#$ ()    *& ' '    +, -    '&'"#$$ .  / > ;

  



 

 

   # 

<  +

 8 

 

   

      ' #       !

  5    

<

 

 

  2222  1

21   2 ) The learned counsel for the appellant-claimant contends that though the learned Tribunal decided issue No. 1 in favour of appellant-claimant but dismissed the claim petition on the ground that the claim petition was filed after one and a half year of the accident. Further on the ground that there was a gap between the medical treatment and the date of the accident. Learned counsel for the appellant contends that once the accident is proved, the Tribunal ought to have awarded the compensation on account of the injuries suffered by the appellant. = 

 #    

!"

#  $  

$#  

$   . " #     #    -
    #   $  #  

 # !



01 

2 

  

 

 23  *) ' 

   & 3     ' 2

    

  4 2  3  5  '

 1*               '  67  $0    $%

5   

' 2   '*    2  '  2       5   23         

 8)'



 

 23     2& *   2&'

  '



&

 7

 23  9 7 '*$.: ;<    '

 37 '

 =  ;

    %! % %  &    5      

 



%% % %    =;

&     '& & '#  

; 2   

     &&   #  

; '  &'=;

'

  ' ''

3

 

;

'

3*$ : =

        =

'&      ' ;

  &    ' 0% %!0% %2   '



       '&   =

''

  '&   '%% % %  0% %4   '

2 7  2

'  * & 

     .0% %3    '

   &  ';

'

3*: $  5=

$0   >

3 '67$.&

      2

'

  ?  = 2   7 '

* & 

'

 

 3 &'7

3 '67$.2 2

              '

    '         *'

2  1  :   23$8    ) & 3* 

  '

 7



 3 '

  ' *  *

2 3

     



  

2   

   5      

  %% % % @ 3* &  &   

'   2  88% .   &3 

&



     %% % %    2*   

'    

  2

'

 3  2 2  23 '

2  '2

7    

'  &      2 '1*  23         3  

' & 

 

3   

3 2 7   

 32

  &

' &   23

        3      

' &      2 '9  ' 

 

3

 2*    

  

2   &  5   23  & 

  

/ &* #   # ' #  "#4& #

 #  $

#   ##

 $

   #

 #    

  

$  $

' #    #  # #

 $

&&         ? 

   #  # 

<

   ,             $

' #   #   



 $  

$ 

 #  

 #  #   ,   &-..    $(**> &( /#  #  #  

#

 #'#



  #  &))  ,    &-..   

    $(**)  

#

$ #

   #  

    

 8 ' #   

  &6 "

   

 #  #  $? 

     &)) 

&)>  ,     judgment of this Court in FAO-195-2006 titled as Mamta and Others Vs. Happy and Others, decided on 29.05.2024, wherein it has been held as under:- "26.

    

  

   

                

                     



     

  !"#$ %%

 

 &



 '

(  ) 



  

 

) 

  

  *     +  

           + 



     

  

    

  

  , -, .

               , /   0 01      

            

          ,2

                     



  

   

            

      +  0   ,
3 

          

   

                     , 




          



    

 ,#         

 

    

    

  

 

      

40    3      

      

      ,




   ) 

                      

,

,
      

  

 



 

   )

  

    , -(,


   

         0                 5%1     55      .

6  '((,7   

  !"#$ %%

&   

         

 

     



    ,
    

!"#$ %% &  

   1   ,8     

 

   ,
  

  1   

 , 
         

     

, -',            

            5%1

   55  .

6  '((       ,9 &>  "

   8      

  $  

# 

&&  &)> 

$

     #

+ 8  ## (+ 8 

   #   &)>  ,   &-..

 

           

        ()*+(**)  

   

                  
 !"  


     # $ %#   & 
  
      
 

     

  


  

 '       ()* 

  

     

   + 
, -.

 &

     

   - #       -  

 '             #

        .

 &

- #   -- #     #      

   #

  

 '  
/ 0  .

   &

         #       ! 1!1 2

! 
  2           
) 3

    

   

2  2 

 

!( )* + ,-   @#   A  8 < ! 8  8   A   B