Mukesh Kumar v. State Of Haryana & ORS
CRWP-119-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH CRWP-119-2016 Date of Decision: January 28, 2016 Mukesh Kumar
...Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana and others
...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARESH KUMAR SANGHI
Present:
Mr. Sanchit Punia, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Apoorv Garg, DAG, Haryana.
Mr. Karamveer Singh Banyana, Advocate, for respondent Nos. 4 to 7.
NARESH KUMAR SANGHI, J (Oral) As per directions dated 27.1.2016, ASI Sumer Singh of Police Station, Pundri, District Kaithal, has produced the alleged deteunue, Monika Rani, before this Court.
Monika Rani states at the bar that she wants to reside with her parents and does not want to accompany the petitioner. PRASHANT KAPOOR 2016.01.29 17:06 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
CRWP-119-2016 In view of above, learned counsel for the petitioner does not press this petition at this stage, to which learned counsel for the respondents have no objection. Ordered accordingly.
(NARESH KUMAR SANGHI) JUDGE January 28, 2016 Pkapoor PRASHANT KAPOOR 2016.01.29 17:06 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document