High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/8462/2018disposed of

Raj @ Rajpatti Devi v. State Of Punjab

2018-05-14Mr. Justice Jasgurpreet Singh Puri2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CRM-M-8462-2018 Date of decision: 14.05.2018 Raj @ Rajpatti Devi

...Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab

...Respondent

CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JAISHREE THAKUR

Present:

Mr. Aditya Jain, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mrs. Anju Arora, Addl. Advocate General, Punjab. **** JAISHREE THAKUR, J. (ORAL) This is a petition for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No. 1 dated 03.01.2018 under Sections 498-A /406 of the IPC, registered at Police Station City Sangrur, District Sangrur. This Court was pleased to pass the following order on 28.02.2018 :- "Learned counsel for the petitioner inter alia contends that all allegations in the FIR pertain to the son of the petitioner and the husband of the complainant as far as the allegations against the petitioner are general and vague in nature. The petitioner is residing at Amethi (UP) whereas her son was residing at Sangrur. It is submitted that whatever the dowry articles are in possession of the petitioner will be handed over to the Investigating Officer.

Notice of motion for 14.05.2018.

Meanwhile, in the event of arrest, the petitioner be released on interim bail subject to her furnishing personal bonds and surety to the satisfaction of Satyawan 2018.05.14 17:15 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court Chandigarh

CRM-M-8462-2018 -2Arresting/Investigating Officer. However, the petitioner shall join the investigation as and when called upon to do so and shall abide by the conditions as provided under Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C. "

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has joined the investigation and he is not required for investigation any further.

Learned counsel for the respondent-State, on instructions from ASI Uddam Singh, confirms the aforesaid fact. Since the petitioner has joined the investigation, the petition is allowed and interim order dated 28.02.2018 is hereby made absolute subject to the condition that the petitioner will not tamper with evidence or hamper the investigation; will not leave India without permission of the Court and will comply with the conditions contained in Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. 14.05.2018 (JAISHREE THAKUR) Satyawan JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes.

Whether reportable No.

Satyawan 2018.05.14 17:15 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court Chandigarh