Rajbir v. State Of Haryana And Others

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CR-2658-2022 (O&M) Date of Decision: July 15, 2022 Rajbir

...Petitioner

VERSUS

State of Haryana and others

...Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ARCHANA PURI

Present:

Mr.Sushil Jain, Advocate for the petitioner.

Ms.Ambika Luthra, Addl. Advocate General, Haryana for the respondent-State.

**** ARCHANA PURI, J.

Present revision petition has been filed for issuance of directions to respondent No.2-Tehsildar, Sonipat, to expeditiously decide the partition application i.e. Case No.64 of 2017 titled as 'Rajbir vs. Krishan Lal and others' dated 06.05.2017 (Annexure P-7). It is now submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is litigating since the year 1986 and is still not able to enjoy the fruits of the litigation. The partition application is pending adjudication since 2017 and no step is being taken for the disposal of the aforesaid partition application.

Notice of motion.

Learned State counsel has put in appearance on behalf of the VINEET GULATI 2022.07.15 13:48 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment Chandigarh

CR-2658-2022 -2respondent-State. On instructions, received from Sh.Manoj Kumar, Tehsildar, who has been impleaded as respondent No.2, in the official capacity, learned State counsel has given assurance qua disposal of the aforesaid partition application, within a period of three months, from today onwards.

Considering the same, respondent No.2 is hereby requested to dispose of the aforesaid partition application, within a period of six months, at the maximum.

The present revision petition stands disposed of accordingly. July 15, 2022 (ARCHANA PURI) Vgulati JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether reportable Yes/No VINEET GULATI 2022.07.15 13:48 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment Chandigarh