Amit Chopra v. State Of Haryana And Others
()* . 12
HE HIGH COURT FOR THE IN TH E STATES OF PUNJAB AND HANDIGARH HARYANA AT CH () )* 3 4 , 2."5"
"""0
+,-, , """, ,
&
!"#$%&!
& % Mr. ,-(./ '
& .,0 &. .
.
*%
% '#"
2& $ '$%&
'
3
4 & $%
'56+ +
"
7 ! .7 !
'5
#$%& $ & (& 2 & & $ ' $% & $ $% & $ $ '% ( (& * # / / # (( )# #$% %& ' * $ & ( & # '
# &
& &$
2&56#
(& & '& +
# #$%#
()*
. 5'$($3%($# & & +
/
!//
& $% ' . 8 $ $( '
& (&
$ $
0 # / '& & #/ #$ &% %/ &&$'
%$& (& * & $ $(
5/ '
&/ (& 9 / $ $% '
& /& ' & $% ' ( ' & & '(& ( & 5 ( ' & (&
4''' (($ $3# 3& ' ( !
. # $ / ' & /
#& /'
&$ '& & $ 5
()*2
!
" #$ %& '
'
&'
" ( )
& #
!
" *+ &
(,# (,* (-* (-. (/# (0# (0( (0* (01 (0- (0. (0/ (00 *,, *,# *(- **0 *10*-,
2 *1 /-,
! !
" 1$ & # (
& *
"3 2 ' ,( ' '' * 3( % '
&$
()*
$ '
(& (& ) '' 23(/$ ' (( (
!!"#$%&'
!!"#$%&'( )*
+ ,- &./0 0%%' 1
2 &../ " 3# 4, 5"6 &70' 8 8
*) &.%."3#%' ,
5) !!46 4"600.'
9 4:56 !&$ 46 " 46 &%%' ,
5)
!&04/6 4"6$$!';
8 <
=( &.70 "3# &0%' (
&.$ "3#.%$' 1
2
'&../"3#&70 <
&.$$"3#0&
2& '# #$ / (%$((: ;< '# '$% 3 '
&$ ' & ' # ' & ;< 2 ( $ & $'
& # (##$ $ (' # ' $ =( * #/ $ / $'
;
< ' ;< 2 ( $ '
2 ($ &( ' ' & $ (' # ' &/ % $=& $
()*5
;/< 2 3 & '
&& ( $ &'& 3& &&
&'& ( $ %' ( '&$ & ;/<8& $#&$ ' &' '% % $ & ( & ) '' & $ &$ ;/<2 $&$( # ;< '
&$ $'&$% ( & & ' # / # % >( $''= ( & & ' (# % ( & & ' # / ' &% '& $''= ( & & ' 2 $ ;< ;< ;<;< ' ,/ ,/#(# $ /&$ '& ( '&$ & / 8 &% '& $ %&$ %#&&&#
% ./$% & $ # '
& ' & ' (%$''= ( & & ' (# % ( & & ' # / ( & & ' & &$ (% $ ( '
&% ' . &% # $ 3 # 3 $&$#&& ;/< ( '/ '' $ $% ( ' &$ '
()*6
;/< 2 & ( (# & #% &$ &'%(&'
;<;< '
(#$% $ //3(
/$ (&#& #&$ % ;=<2 &' ;< ' '
&$ ' $ ( % .% (&# $ ?%@ & $3 % 9&&%$ /& '# & '( '& & ' & :( #/$& / & ' & $ & ' $$ # / 4
'
' & & '
Further, a perusal of order dated 11.08.2017 reveals that when the matter was taken up on that date, the proclamation was received back executed, however, since the period of 30 days had not elapsed, the matter was adjourned to 11.09.2017 awaiting the appearance of the petitioner. However, while adjourning the case to 11.09.2017, the trial Court failed to consider the fact that /=($%(&%, ' & # 3 $ &$ & $# '&$ ' & &'& ' # % 6' = $ (
94:56 !&$46 " 46&%%
()*
( & ' 5'
.
A/& ' '56 # #& $&'.' '
.
* #/ & $% (&%/#& $/ $ = # '% ' # # & / $ #$ # # # 2 #%''
#($% (&$ '& .#& $ ( + % 'A=.''3/ )#)& & # / $ # $% . $% $ &( /& ('
. ' $%# & '$ $$%
'# 6 =$&& *9
9 !&0 ""> 4:56%%0 11.
. % /# ' ( $ / && #(&
4& $%
' 56 +
"
7 ! .7 ! '5
#$%& $& ( & 3# 3& ' (
* #/& $'
# & ' = # $, '
()*
& %$'%& & $'
' 5$ '% '
'& %$ & $ $ $ ( , % $, % '
' $ $ & $% ##
+ $/%&& '$'
'
'$ $$ & '(=& % $ =& ' % & ( $ ' & '(
2 && ' & $'
(% 31.05.2024 (MANISHA BATRA)
JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether reportable Yes