High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRR(F)/795/2024dismissed

Priya Anand And Another v. Harleen Singh Sethi

2024-07-16Mr. Justice Harpreet Singh Brar9 pages

" # $ %&'!&!

(

)

&( * + !( !

,!( +(!-(

!. '!.(#'

(-!% .% # *$! (# # & !

+/!!! .

. *

0 ( .! / / ! (

0( 1 *

0( 1

*/ . #'! ! (

! ! 1 %'%%/ /! (#!/%3*.%!%/-

$/+ *. .%(##-/!#(%( % (# &

3'. ,! (% (%!%..-!( ,!% .% # +

..%%/ *

0( .!+# !(

0( 1 *

0( 1

+-!.*!( !+ (( !!# -%'!( (

5 #% !( !

## + .'

.# . . ! - / ! ( /!! /! ! #% . !

( 6#%( + !! (/ 3'

7)"%%'*8%!

$# ! %#(!( ( /-! (!# ! '

+!# .

. *

0 -(9

( !. #'! ( 1 !# . 6!+! % #% !( ( #!

/!!-%

,!-:(# (-!'

'.# !!((# ## +'

# %# .

' !..*:# #%-%.#- #3# !!( +' /((#!

! ! (# ,! # ;# # ! . ( '/!%-'%+!%'%+-!!( + # &

#( */!!( +( %:#/.*!% .( ,!( + &

/ .# # ! %:# ( (/.*!% ( */!!%%%/!! #% /( % 4 - % 4 ! #6

8#'2!!$<-%&#( .#

(3'!

#'!8#.2+* (!%%/

#)#

! " !!

! # $ /8#'2!!$<-%&#( .#

!" # $$ (3'!

#'!8# =>*(%%/

% # ! # ! ! #

!! # #

!# $

! -:+!%'%# !#'!!+-! ( +( +. !((%(## '

( ' . '' # . .% (# ! ! !0! .! %0!.%*!+##(# #!%'* # !!%#(#

,! ' %!( !/.(%!

!!#-%!#%.*.3'#% .! '(! +%%./!9# ,! +% %..# #(#%#%- ' ! #% (+ '

( !#

+;##../!! :# .( (%;## ,!;##..

#(# .#-:#-% %( +## !((# %+#

!/9 .!.-'!

(% 9 +'*# '!! !/ #% (#

,!;#!.%%/!- .- ! 3!((#-'-%%% -% .

@!%%'/!!#. & / 8#'-!!$<-%&#( .# *+

,- ,** .* /, !'"

)(* % / ! .' ;##. .#!%%/' '%%%

&'!! (

() * ! !

+& , #

### # . # . #

! ,. #

.# # .#

# ! .###+ .### , !

! + !. /#+ # 0 1 2 31 3 (445)5 5 06! (7)

"81 9++1(75) -7

/# # # , 9

#&# # # +

"##

+ ! !

8 .

; ! & # ! # # ! # , +

, # ! !# , 0 + + (74)

()9 # #

<(77-) =

- # #& # # & #

# !

! , # #

() >989 ! # , / () >989

# # ! + ?() () # ()

* ! ()@ !!

! () @# !

() 7()3 9 !

#* , #

#0# # # #

() 3> <> > :7(775)3A =##

0 #

!*!

= B/

@ !

- ! !/

#+# /

7 /

# #*:9

5 '

() 9 # ,

! $ &&& &&& &&& %)

(

"# </ 6 #

# & #9: "?

**&"!

(

! ! # !C!*3 *8 ! %?

#$# ()# !

! # #

* # #! # , ?

()!

, .

() *, ! # , + , %

- (

939A & D" """"" !

! C!

*3*8 ! !

((

'!! (

C , !

+ <"""

#& !&! *#! !

.(. ( +

%+# #

</"6

( 0/1 (!

(

C*& ! -9>8 9 4=. 7(=) 3 9. - !

! ! ! - =7 # ;EE"

6+/!-+*!# ! '#. +-% #% !( !'*% .

#1# .'

!( !( ( +!

(+%.-#'+

$+'! % #% !( and after perusing the record with his able assistance, ( !! (!%. !( 1 ) & 26 .! '

0 ( .!! *t is evident that petitioner No.1-wife is well qualified and has the capacity to earn. The facts of the case would be squarely covered by the judgments rendered by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Bhushan Kumar Meen v. Mansi Meen @ Harpreet Kaur (2010) 15 SCC 372 and Anu Kaul v. Rajeev Kaul (2009) 13 SCC 209 and the Division Bench of the Delhi High Court in X v. Y passed in MAT. APP. (F.C.) 78/2023 decided on 11.10.2023. The Court below has duly considered the material placed before it for determining the quantum of maintenance and granting Rs.7,000/- to the petitioners as interim maintenance. A careful and just balance has been drawn, keeping in view the spiralling inflation rates and the high cost of living corresponding to the reasonable needs of the petitioners.

Learned counsel for the petitioners has not been able to indicate any perversity in the impugned order which warrants interference by this Court. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed being bereft of any merit. However, liberty is granted to the petitioners to raise all the pleas taken in the present petition at the appropriate stage before the learned Family Court.

1!' - + ! -+ !%% - # - 9( (-!# %.( :#! % ,!%

#%# %# ( /!! %/. * % /!%/ ! "

0'$'( B @!! (3'0 A01 @!! ( -% A01