Sudesh v. State Of Haryana And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-8589-2018 Date of decision: 28.02.2018 Sudesh

...Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana and others

...Respondents

***** CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JAISHREE THAKUR

Present:

Mr. Vikram Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner.

**** JAISHREE THAKUR, J. (ORAL) The instant petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the petitioner for issuance of a direction to respondent No.2 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioner at the hands of the persons named in representation dated 18.08.2017 (Annexure P-1) on which till date no action has been taken by respondent No.2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he would be satisfied if respondent No.2 be directed to look into the representation dated 18.08.2017 (Annexure P-1) and take action in accordance with law, in a time bound manner.

Notice of motion.

Mr. P.P. Chahar, learned DAG, Haryana, who is present in the Court, accepts notice on behalf of the State. Three copies of the petition be handed over to him by learned counsel for the petitioner during the course Satyawan 2018.02.28 18:03 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court Chandigarh

CRM-M-8589-2018 -2of the day failing which no action is called for. He submits that representation dated 18.08.2017 (Annexure P-1) will be decided within a period of four weeks.

Heard.

Without going into the merits of the case, the instant petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 to decide representation dated 18.08.2017 (Annexure P-1), within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of the certified copy of this order and take necessary action in accordance with law.

28.02.2018 (JAISHREE THAKUR) Satyawan JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes.

Whether reportable No.

Satyawan 2018.02.28 18:03 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court Chandigarh