Shabi Singh @ Satnam Singh v. State Of Punjab

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

CRM-M-27921 of 2020 (O&M) Date of decision : 16.10.2020 ...

Shabi Singh @ Satnam Singh ................Petitioner vs.

State of Punjab .................Respondent Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice H. S. Madaan Present: Mr. Munish Raj Chaudhary, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. H.S. Sullar, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab. ...

H. S. Madaan, J. (Oral) Case taken up through video conferencing.

Learned counsel for the petitioner states that on account of personal difficulty, petitioner could not join the investigation as directed vide order dated 15.9.2020.

Learned State counsel also states that the investigation has not been joined by the petitioner.

Vide order dated 15.9.2020, a specific direction was issued to the petitioner to appear before the Investigating Officer and join the investigation, but he has not complied with the same. The explanation referred for this lapse does not appear to be convincing. Therefore, the petition stands dismissed on account of non-compliance of orders passed by this court. ( H.S. Madaan ) 16.10.2020 Judge chugh Whether speaking / reasoned Yes / No Whether reportable Yes / No BANITA CHUGH 2020.10.16 01:57 I am the author of this document