Subhash Saini v. State Of Haryana

CRM-M- 25142of 2025 (O&M)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M- 25142 of 2025 (O&M) Date of decision : August 27, 2025 Subhash Saini ...... Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana ...... Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ *** Present :-Mr. Rajesh Lamba, Advocate for the petitioner.

Ms. Chavvi Sharma, Asstt. Advocate General, Haryana. Mr. Tejas Bansal, Advocate for the complainant. **** VINOD S. BHARDWAJ , J. (Oral) 1.

The petitioner has filed the instant petition under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023 for grant of pre-arrest bail to the petitioner in case FIR No. 320 dated 30.07.2024 under Sections 420, 406, 120-B , Indian Penal Code, 1860 registered at Police Station Gannaur, District Sonipat.

2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner inter alia contends that pursuant to the order dated 14.05.2025 passed by this Court, the petitioner has joined investigation and is no longer required for investigation of the case.

3.

Learned State counsel on instruction corroborates the said averment and submits that the custodial interrogation of the petitioner is not required for the purpose of investigation. ARCHANA ARORA 2025.08.28 15:09 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CRM-M- 25142of 2025 (O&M) 4.

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

5.

Since the petitioner has joined the investigation and his custodial interrogation is not required, the present petition is allowed and the interim order dated 14.05.2025 is made absolute. 6.

However, if required, the petitioner shall continue to join investigation as and when required to do so and shall abide by the terms and conditions, as laid down under Section 482 (2) BNSS. ( VINOD S. BHARDWAJ) JUDGE August 27, 2025 archana Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable :

Yes/No ARCHANA ARORA 2025.08.28 15:09 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document