Lakhwinder Kaur v. State
Date of decision: 7th July, 2015 Lakhwinder Kaur
Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab
Respondent
! ! 1.
Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2.
Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.
Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?
Present:
None for the petitioner.
Mr. J.S. Brar, Asstt. Advocate General, Punjab with ASI Satnam Singh.
!"# $ It is submitted on behalf of the State that the alleged detenue Gurpinder Singh son of the petitioner along with others namely Raja Singh, Surjit Singh and Daljit Singh @ Dattu, all residents of village Kulla were apprehended on 14.06.2015 in case FIR No.37 dated 03.03.2015 registered under Sections 342, 380, 454, 411 IPC and were produced before the concerned Court on 15.06.2015 and now they are in judicial custody.
Keeping in view the fact that the FIR in which son of the petitioner was arrested was prior to the alleged date of detention and RATTAN PAL SINGH 2015.07.08 16:10 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court
that nothing can be found fault with when the police has taken recourse to judicial process, does not calls for any interference. Thus, the petition stands dismissed having been rendered infructuous.
# !$ %&'(" RATTAN PAL SINGH 2015.07.08 16:10 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court