High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCWP/16173/2019dismissed

M/S Alchem International Limited Through His Authorized Officer, Sandeep Malik, Faridabad v. Presiding Officer Labour Industrial-Tribunal-Cum-Labour Court No Ii, Faridabad And Another

2024-05-18Mr. Justice Sanjay Vashisth2 pages

106+226

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CWP-16173-2019 (O&M) DECIDED ON: 18.05.2024 M/S ALCHEM INTERNATIONAL LIMITED THROUGH HIS AUTHORIZED OFFICER, SANDEEP MALIK, FARIDABAD .....PETITIONER

VERSUS

PRESIDING OFFICER LABOUR INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNALCUM-LABOUR COURT NO II, FARIDABAD AND ANOTHER .....RESPONDENTS

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH.

Present:

Mr. S.S. Saini, Advocate, for the petitioner. None for respondent No.2.

SANJAY VASHISTH, J (ORAL) CM-1075-CWP-2024 Present application has been moved by the applicant/respondent No.2 for placing on record written statement on behalf of respondent No.2.

Counsel for the applicant/respondent No.2 submits that copy of the said written statement has already been supplied to the counsel opposite.

Considering the averments mentioned in the application, prayer made in the application is allowed and written statement on behalf of respondent No.2 is ordered to be taken on record. Registry is directed to tag the same at the appropriate place on the file. CM stands disposed of.

LAVISHA 2024.05.18 18:20 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment Punjab & Haryana High Court, Chandigarh

CWP-16173-2019 (O&M) -2CWP-16173-2019 Present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner - Management i.e. M/s Alchem International Limited, challenging the award dated 26.11.2018 (Annexure P-8), whereby reference No.124 of 2010, has been answered in favour of respondent No.2 - Surender Pal Sharma (workman), and he was held entitled for a lump sum amount of of compensation of Rs.1,75,000/- (Rupees one lac seventy five thousand only) along with interest @ 9% p.a., in lieu of his claim for reinstatement in service, back wages and other service benefits. Counsel for the petitioner submits that complete amount ordered by learned Labour Court has already been paid to the workman, therefore, he has received required instructions for withdrawal of the present writ petition. Thus, he seeks withdrawal of the present writ petition.

Dismissed as withdrawn.

(SANJAY VASHISTH) 18.05.2024 JUDGE Lavisha Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No LAVISHA 2024.05.18 18:20 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment Punjab & Haryana High Court, Chandigarh