Bijender Malik v. State Of Haryana

CRM-M No.33436 of 2021 ...1...

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M No.33436 of 2021 Date of Decision: 08th February, 2022.

Bijender Malik

...Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana

...Respondent

(Heard through Video-Conferencing) CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA

Present:

Mr. Samrat Malik Advocate, for the petitioner.

Ms. Ambika Sood, Additional Advocate General, Haryana.

* * * * MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA, J.

(ORAL) The petitioner herein has sought the relief of anticipatory bail in the criminal case arising out of the FIR bearing No.480 dated 24.07.2021 registered at Police Station Chandibagh Panipat, under Section 420 IPC and Section 32 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 and Sections 100, 101 & 107 of the Mental Health Act. Learned State counsel, on the instructions from SI Deepak Kumar from the above-said Police Station, apprises the Court that in compliance of the order dated 18.08.2021 as passed by this Court, the petitioner has joined in the investigation and his custodial interrogation is not required and he is also not involved in any other criminal case of the similar nature.

SEEMA SHARMA 2022.02.08 16:31 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document

CRM-M No.33436 of 2021 ...2...

In view of the afore-discussed submission as made by learned State counsel, the instant petition is allowed and the relief of interim bail, as extended to the petitioner by this Court vide the said order dated 18.08.2021, is hereby made absolute.

However, the petitioner shall continue to join in the investigation as and when required/called upon to do so and shall also strictly abide by all the conditions as laid down in Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C. (MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA) JUDGE 08.02.2022.

seema Whether speaking/reasoned?

Yes Whether Reportable?

No SEEMA SHARMA 2022.02.08 16:31 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document