High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/24579/2026disposed of

Amit Arjan Mirchandani v. State Of Haryana And Others

2026-05-29Mr. Justice Jasjit Singh Bedi2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

CRM-M-24579-2026 Date of decision: 29.05.2026 AMIT ARJAN MIRCHANDANI ...... Petitioner(s) V/s STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

...Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASJIT SINGH BEDI

Present:

Mr. Dhruv Trehan, Advocate for the petitioner(s).

Ms. Geeta Rani, AAG, Haryana.

Mr. Charman Bir Singh Juneja, Advocate for respondents No.2 to 6.

***** JASJIT SINGH BEDI, J. (Oral) The prayer in this petition is for quashing of FIR No. 0089 dated 07.05.2025 registered under Sections 316(2), 318(4), 336, 338 BNS, 2023 at Police Station Sector 7, Panchkula and all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise dated 13.04.2026 (Annexure P-2).

Vide order dated 04.05.2026 this Court had directed the parties to appear before Illaqa Magistrate for getting their statements recorded in terms of certain parameters given in the aforesaid order dated 04.05.2026 with regard to the compromise (Annexure P-2). In terms of the orders dated 04.05.2026 passed by this Court parties have appeared before the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, VISHAL SETHI 2026.05.30 13:02 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CRM-M-24579-2026 -2Panchkula and as per the report dated 16.05.2026 submitted to this Court, both the parties have got recorded their respective statements in Court. A perusal of the aforesaid report would show that the parties have effected a genuine compromise without there being any pressure, coercion or undue influence. In view of the compromise there is a remote possibility of the complainant coming forward to support the prosecution case. The powers under Section 482 Cr.PC can be exercised in such like situation in order to prevent unnecessary vagaries of criminal trial to be faced by the parties, when there are remote chances of conviction of the accused. The compromise in question is found to be fully in consonance with the direction issued by the Court in Kulwinder Singh & Ors. Vs.

State of Punjab 2007(3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab & Anr., 2012(4) RCR (Crl.) 543. In view of the aforesaid report of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Panchkula, accompanied by the joint statement of both the parties, the present FIR No. 0089 dated 07.05.2025 registered under Sections 316(2), 318(4), 336, 338 BNS, 2023 at Police Station Sector 7, Panchkula, and all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom are hereby quashed qua the petitioners herein.

Petition stands disposed of.

( JASJIT SINGH BEDI) JUDGE May 29, 2026 vishal Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No VISHAL SETHI 2026.05.30 13:02 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document