Navjot Kaur And ORS v. State Of Punjab And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CRM-M-8861-2018 Date of decision: 24.05.2018 Navjot Kaur and others

...Petitioners

Versus

State of Punjab and another

...Respondents

CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JAISHREE THAKUR

Present:

Mr. A.G.S. Dhillon, Advocate, for the petitioners.

Mrs. Anju Arora, Addl. Advocate General, Punjab. **** JAISHREE THAKUR, J. (ORAL) This is a petition that has been filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners in complaint case No. 39 dated 23.07.2015, under Sections 406, 498-A IPC and under Sections 3 (r) & (s) of the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, titled as Reshma Vaid vs. Kamal Nain Singh and others.

Ms. Anupam, Advocate, puts in appearance and files power of attorney on behalf of the competent.

Learned counsel for the petitioners contends that pursuant to the order dated 01.03.2018, the petitioners have appeared before the trial Court and furnished requisite bail bonds and are facing trial there. Satyawan 2018.05.30 09:28 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court Chandigarh

CRM-M-8861-2018 -2In view of the above statement, since the petitioners have already appeared before the trial Court and have furnished his bail bonds, no further orders are called for by this Court.

The petition stands disposed of accordingly.

24.05.2018 (JAISHREE THAKUR) Satyawan JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes.

Whether reportable No.

Satyawan 2018.05.30 09:28 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court Chandigarh