Usha Sekhri And ANR v. State Of Haryana & ORS
Civil Writ Petition No. 10062 of 2015 Date of Decision: 12.09.2017 Usha Sekhri and another .....Petitioners versus State of Haryana and others .....Respondents
Present :
Mr. Tushar Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Deepak Balyan, Additional Advocate General, Haryana, for respondent No.1.
Mr. Deepak Sabharwal, Advocate, for respondent Nos.2 to 4.
****
!
" #
$
%
&' (
*+
*)" )+ ))
*)" ( !
!
,**-$( %
! ! ! .**-$ ( / 0
1!
)2+)3 ( 1 %!
.
4+( 5 * *4 )22+ ' -16 7
)) *2
**) '$ -8 7 "
# + *2
**) ' / 0 -8 7 98 7 :
$)* ;$ <)* % 6 #- 3 !- ! ! 4,= 0 !'
0 '0 ,= 0 ! 0! ,= 0 !- ! )*= - ! ,= 03 0 > 0 $ 3 !- ! 0 ' 0 $ !
! ( - ,*= 0
0 $ '
0' !- ! ! 0 ' 0 ' ? , 7 @ #@ 0 )+
**2! - 7 '!0 0> 8 7 !'
# '! .**-$( ' '0
( ' )+
**, # ' 08 7 @ #@ .
1 *
*.
**2 @ # @ '
0( !
% (
% 0 *+ *.
**2 ! '30 ' 0 3 #@ @ / *2 *.
**2
% ! 0 0 *+ *.
**2' )* *.
**20 @ #@ 5 *"
*+
**2
- % A%! )) % 0 *)
**2! ! 6 6
!
! - % A %! 0>
!'
'
4,-$ ( 9
,**-$ ( : ' ' ( ,=
*3***-$
" 0 -0( $
! 0 **)$* .,**-$ ( %
0 *.
**2 ' 0 .**-$ ( !'
))='
*
*.
**2 !' .4+"-$ 8 0 ' ! ' $ 0 0' %
'( 0
43.
3)"*-$ ))= *2
**2 + %
232+3+* -$ B 3 $ *"
*+
*)*
7
C( -% A%! '! %
D 7
)24,* *)* & ! / %
' 0>! )4
*) 0 ! "
# & ! !
#
! )
*+
*)"
!
, % '
! !# 7$ **, * *)
**4;$ < ;$ );8 ! 1 @ ! !# # 3 !
! / ! 7 9 7$ **,: #
0 ! 7$ **, '
1 ' !
"23 7$E3 B @! 6 # ! & ! % ! ' )2
**. ' ! 0 0 0 !0&' ' '
!
0 9: - '
6 0 ! ! & ! ( % 0 ! 6 3 '
!;$
: > 0
- 97% : '
!
7% '
0 ! 8 %
'
0( ,= 0
-0( $ 3 0 0 3 7$ **,3 ' ! ?
. )) % 0
****-$( % ! !-0 ' < 0 -0( FFFF ? #' 8 7 )+
**, @ # @
)+
**2 # ' %( ' 0)+
**, )+
**2! 0 50 0 '
**2 )+
**,
' - 8 7 #'0! 0 '
**2 )+
**2
' '
' % C 0 -0(
)+
**2
)+
**,! 0 ' %'0( ! 0 % ! ,= 0 ' % ' 0 % ! 0& % 0 0 ' ! # ' '0 &
4 0 '0 %0 ! !
! $" ' -0( 0 0 0
3
!" ! # ravinder Whether speaking/reasoned √ Yes Whether reportable √Yes