Jagmani Sohal v. State Of Punjab And ORS

-1CWP No.10065 of 2015

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CWP No.10065 of 2015 Date of decision: 16.11.2015 Jagmani Sohal ....Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab and others ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PARAMJEET SINGH 1) Whether Reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?

2) To be referred to the Reporters or not ?

3) Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? Present: - Mr. Gurinder Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Suresh Singla, Addl. A.G., Punjab.

Mr. Rajender Kumar, Advocate, for Mr. Preetwinder Singh Dhaliwal, Advocate, for respondents No.5 and 6.

***** PARAMJEET SINGH, J. (ORAL) Instant writ petition has been filed for issuance of a writ in the nature of prohibition, prohibiting respondents No.3 and 4 from causing undue harassment, humiliation and trauma to the petitioner, a USA citizen, who is in India to look after her aged, ailing, bed ridden parents. While issuing notice of motion on 19.05.2015, petitioner was directed to join the proceedings, if any, and respondents were directed not to take her in custody.

In pursuance of order dated 19.05.2015, respondent No.4 - RAVINDER SINGH 2015.11.20 11:32 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document

-2CWP No.10065 of 2015 Inspector Raghbir Singh is present in Court and states that petitioner has joined the investigation and is not required for investigation anymore. He further states that the complaint moved against the petitioner has already been filed.

In view of above, present writ petition has been rendered infructuous.

Dismissed as infructuous.

(Paramjeet Singh) November 16, 2015 Judge R.S.

RAVINDER SINGH 2015.11.20 11:32 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document