Krishan Kumar Alias Mokhiya v. State Of Haryana

IN TH HE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA AB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-2 24502-2026(O&M) Date of de ecision: 07.05.2026 Krishan Kumar @ Mokhiya

...Petitioner

VERSUS

State of Haryana a

...Respondent

CORAM : HO ON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINO OD S. BHARDWAJ Present :- Mr.

. Sanchit Punia, Advocate for th he petitioner.

Mr.

. Paras Talwar, Sr. DAG, Haryan na.

*** *** VINOD S. BHA ARDWAJ, J. (Oral) The e instant first petition has been fi filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Naga rik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in ca ase bearing FIR No.351 dated 10.10.2025 registered under Sections 305, 11 12, 111(4) and 319 of the Bhara atiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 at Police Station U Urban Estate, District Hisar.

2.

The e FIR in the present case has bee en registered on the statement of one Monu so on of Satbir, alleging that he al longwith his friends reached Hisar after a trip p from Rajasthan at about 12:00 0 A.M. in his Scorpio vehicle bearing Registra ation No.HR-14W-1015. The sa aid vehicle had been parked near Real PG in n front of Sharda Public School l. He and his friends went to sleep in PG and when they woke up in the morn ing at around 07:00AM, they found that the s said vehicle was missing. Alleg ging that the same has been stolen by som me unknown persons, the FI IR got registered. During investigation, o ffences under Section 112, 114 4(4) and 319 of BNS were added in this c case as the stolen vehicle wa s sold by preparing forged documents.

CRM-M-24502-2026(O&M) 3.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner contends that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case, where he was arrested on 04.12.2025. The petitioner is already in judicial custody and no recovery has been effected from the petitioner. 4.

Learned State Counsel on the other hand contends that the petitioner is member of an organized syndicate allegedly involved in theft and sale of stolen vehicles by forging documents. He further contends that main accused-Paramjit is yet to be arrested and recovery of the vehicle remains to be effected. He however does not dispute that no investigation is pending qua petitioner and challan qua him already stands filed. The custody period of the petitioner is also not disputed. It is also argued that that the offences in question are triable by the Court of Magistrate and trial shall take long.

5.

I have heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respective parties and have gone through the documents appended along with the present petition.

6.

Without commenting on the merits of the case and taking into consideration the nature of allegations levelled against the petitioner, the period of custody undergone by him as well as the fact that the offences in question are triable by the Court of Magistrate, I deem it appropriate to allow the present petition.

7.

The instant petition is allowed and the petitioner is ordered to be released on regular bail on his furnishing requisite bail bond/surety bond to the satisfaction of the trial Court/Duty Magistrate, concerned.

CRM-M-24502-2026(O&M) 8.

It is made clear that the petitioner shall not extend any threat and shall not influence any prosecution witnesses in any manner directly or indirectly.

9.

The observation made hereinabove shall not be construed as an expression on the merits of the case and the Trial Court shall decide the case on the basis of available material.

10.

Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. 07.05.2026 (VINOD S. BHARDWAJ) Sumit Gusain JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes/No Whether reportable :

Yes/No