Surya Parshad, Junior Assistant (Retd) v. State Of Punjab And Others

CWP No.1008 of 2015 -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.1008 of 2015 Date of Decision: 21.01.2015 Surya Parshad ..... Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab and others ..... Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV NARAIN RAINA

Present:

Mr. Raj Kaushik, Advocate, for the petitioner.

1. To be referred to the Reporters or not?

2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? RAJIV NARAIN RAINA, J.(Oral) The petitioner retired from the Punjab State Cooperative Handloom Federation Limited - respondent No.3 on March 28, 2013. He is aggrieved by non-payment of gratuity, leave encashment etc. and other claims as set out in the legal notice dated December 21, 2014 (P-4) addressed to the Registrar, Cooperative Societies, Punjab as well. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the legal notice has not been addressed so far and, therefore, he seeks a direction to the respondents No.2 & 3 to consider and decide his legal notice. Without going into the merits of the case, a direction is issued to respondent Nos.2 & 3 to look into the grievance of the petitioner and redress it within two months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. In case, the dues are found payable the same may be paid within the same time frame. In case, the claim is not sustainable for any valid reason MANJU 2015.01.23 10:49 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court Chandigarh

CWP No.1008 of 2015 -2then a speaking order would need to be passed after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner.

With these observations, the petition stands disposed of. (RAJIV NARAIN RAINA) JUDGE 21.01.2015 manju MANJU 2015.01.23 10:49 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court Chandigarh