Lakhwinder Singh v. Punjab State Power Corporation Limited And ORS
!"#"$%& ' '
(% )*( + ,
!"
!"
,-.
*/ $% %
#&
"&
'(
%
*
+, -
.+/ 1
234
5
& "
#
## " !
#
+3
..
1
2'4
!
%
6
2
-
.+8
&
&
"
&%
&%
"
#
## "
1
23 ##
+3
..
1
2'4 ,
!
" " 5!
.+ && + 6&% .+3
"
!
&
.+8
:
"
"
!
2
" "
3
"
!"
2
&%
## "
!
&
&%
"
%
&%
"
!
#&&% #&&
# % "
"
'
8 !
"
!
" '
&%
5+
"
-
.+'
"1.
That shortage of Rs.94,897/- was found for conducting the work at 11 KV U.P.S. Feeder at Manochal and the work was remain pendng on this line and the work was not completed and even after transfer of the employee the material was not handed over to the next Junior Engineer.
2.
That while fixing the three pole at single line at L.T, City Feeder while giving connection to Sh. Gurnam Singh son of Sh. Gurdev Singh and Sh. Harbhej Singh son of Sh. Sardool Singh of Village Manochal Kalan Derian, the same was connected without measurement and in place of depositing the amount in the department kept the same with him."
7.
" "&
<;
&&
67 0
583/,'4
"
&
(
&% !
1
"
" "&
1& !
+
"
&%
1
'.=
!"
1 ,// 6
-
"
&% 8 "& #
"&
;
" "& 7 * %
&% >
" #
#
67 .+..+3
&% ,
"
1
"&
"
.+..+3
!
/..
"
.+8
* % 8.8+
"
67
#
+ ?&
"
!
"&&
!
" "
&&
+
"
6
&
( &
"
"
"%
## ! @ $&
!
!
,8 ...(2
%
1
% %
&%
-
#&&
6
" -
&% ++ +
+, "& #
?
"& &%
@ !
,8 ...(2
&
#
&%
&% A +'
"& #
&
-
67
*
&%
"
-
&% !
"
"& ;
#
', ?
&%
"&
5,
" "
%
&
"&
7 $ 5+33/
" "
-! &
& "
,//
&& "&
&
%
&%
,
,
7 0
5//+>34
,'8
.+.+8
#&&
&&
(2
2C " 7 * officer, PSPCL, Patiala."
8.
;
" " " &
"
&% "
"&
"& "
"
" " " (
>
!
" &
"
&
+.
!
&%
( 0!1&- ' .
,/ 20 E
(
(5 E
&
(5