Teja Singh And ORS v. State Of Punjab And ANR

CRM-M No.30200 of 2022 --1--

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M No.30200 of 2022

Reserved on: 18.08.2022

Pronounced on: 23.09.2022 Teja Singh and others ......Petitioners Vs.

State of Punjab and another ......Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA

Present:

Mr. Shakti Mehta, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Harsimar Singh Sitta, AAG, Punjab.

Mr. T.K. Gupta, Advocate for Mr. Vipul Sachdeva, Advocate, for respondent No.2.

*** ANOOP CHITKARA J.

FIR No.

Dated Police Station Sections 19.07.2021 City Samana, District Patiala 452, 323, 506, 148, 149 IPC The petitioners, arraigned as accused in the above captioned FIR, have come up before this Court under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing of the FIR and all consequential proceedings based on the compromise with the aggrieved person. 2.

During the pendency of the petition, the accused and the aggrieved person have compromised the matter, and its copy is annexed with this petition as Annexure P-2. 3.

After that, the petitioners came up before this Court to quash the FIR, and in the quashing petition, impleading the aggrieved person as respondent. 4.

On 29.07.2022, the aggrieved person Raj Kumar (R-2) stated before the SDJM, Samana and stated that there would be no objection if the court quashes this FIR and consequent proceedings. As per the concerned court's report dated 06.08.2022, the parties consented to the quashing of FIR and consequent proceedings without any threat. JYOTI 2022.09.26 15:22 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CRM-M No.30200 of 2022 --2-- ANALYSIS & REASONING:

5.

However, the petitioners did not arraign the aggrieved Sarabjeet Kaur as a respondent in this case.

6.

Since all the victims did not state about their no objection to the compromise and also the reasons which led to the compromise, as such this court cannot proceed further in this matter.

7.

Given above, the petition is dismissed. However, liberty is reserved to the petitioners to file a fresh petition and there would be no necessity re-examine the complainant Raj Kumar and the accused, whose statements stand recorded. The copies of the statements alongwith report would suffice.

Petition dismissed in the terms mentioned above, with liberty reserved. (ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE 23.09.2022 Jyoti-II Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes Whether reportable:

No.

JYOTI 2022.09.26 15:22 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document