← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCWP/14612/2020disposed of

Om Parkash And Others v. State Of Haryana And Another

2025-09-26Mr. Justice Jagmohan Bansal2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH **** CWP-14612-2020 Date of Decision: 26.09.2025 OM PARKASH AND OTHERS

...Petitioners

Versus

STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS.

...Respondents

And Sr.

Case No.

Petitioner(s) Respondent(s) No.

2.

CWP-21435-2020 Lal Singh Yadav State of Haryana and Ors.

and Ors.

3.

CWP-21725-2020 Subhash Chander State of Haryana and Ors.

Verma and Ors.

4.

CWP-22429-2020 Subhash Chander State of Haryana and Ors.

and Ors.

5.

CWP-22487-2020 Suresh Bala and State of Haryana and Ors.

Ors.

6.

CWP-22495-2020 Ramesh Chander State of Haryana and Ors.

and Ors.

7.

CWP-22515-2020 Satyavir Singh State of Haryana and Ors.

Yadav and Ors.

CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present:- Mr. Rajesh Kumar Dhankar, Advocate for petitioners (in CWP-14612-2020, CWP-21435-2020 and CWP-217252020) Ms. Sandeep Kaur, Advocate for Mr. Vikram Sheoran, Advocate for petitioners (in CWP-22429-2020, CWP-22487-2020, CWP-22495-2020 and CWP-22515-2020) Mr. Ravi Partap Singh, DAG Haryana *** DEEPAK BISSYAN 2025.09.26 17:29 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CWP-14612-2020 -2JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL) 1.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submit that issue involved is pending before Hon'ble Supreme Court in SLP(C)-191582024. They submit that instant petitions may be disposed of in terms of order dated 23.09.2025 passed by Division Bench of this Court in CWP25967-2025 titled as 'Sant Kumar and Ors. Vs. State of Haryana and Ors.'. The relevant extracts of order dated 23.09.2025 are reproduced as below:- "3. In view of the aforesaid observations, the present Writ Petition stands disposed of in terms of order dated 16.09.2025 passed in the case of Dharambir and Others (Supra). However, liberty is granted to the petitioners to revive the present petition in the event the Hon'ble Apex Court takes a different view in the matter with what has been taken by this Court."

2.

Learned State counsel concedes that claim of petitioners would be reconsidered, the moment aforesaid SLP is adjudicated or any other judgment is passed by Hon'ble Supreme Court on the issue involved.

3.

Disposed of in terms of Sant Kumar (supra).

4.

Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. (JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE September 26, 2025 Deepak DPA Whether Speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether Reportable:

Yes/No DEEPAK BISSYAN 2025.09.26 17:29 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document