Anil Kumar v. Anurag Rastogi And Another

COCP-22 268-2025 (O&M) [1] 162(4) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUN NJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIG CO Da mar

VERSUS

ARH OCP No. 2268-2025 (O&M) ate of Decision: 17.07.2025 Anil Kum

...Petitioner

Anurag

CORAM

Present :

Rastogi and anr.

...Respondents

: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H HARKESH MANUJA : Ms. Mamta, Advocate for Mr. Chanderhas Yadav, A for the petitioner.

Mr. Manish Dadwal, AAG, **** Advocate Haryana.

HARKES SH MANUJA, J. (ORAL) Learned counsel for the r respondents while relying up pon office ord der dated 30.06.2025 submi its that the benefits due to the petitione r have been released in his fa avour.

2.

In view thereof, no furthe r cause survives in the pres ent petition.

3.

Disposed of in the above t terms.

4.

Rule discharged.

5.

Pending miscellaneous a application(s), if any, shall a lso stand dis sposed of.

( HARKESH MANUJA) 17.07.20 sanjay JUDGE Whether speaking/reasone Whether Reportable ?

ed ?

Yes/No Yes/No SANJAY GUPTA 2025.07.17 18:31 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document