Narinder Kumar v. Union Of India And Others

105 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.13866 of 2024 (O&M) Date of Decision:31.05.2024 Narinder Kumar ....Petitioner vs.

Union of India and others ....Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL

Present:

Mr. S.S.Kamboj, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Karan Kumar Jund, Senior Panel Counsel for the Union of India Mr. Aman Dhir, DAG, Punjab *** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL) 1.

The petitioner through instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India is seeking direction to respondents to issue travel document to enable him to visit India.

2.

The petitioner is a resident of Barnala, however, at present is staying in UAE. The petitioner has been implicated in FIR No. 66 dated 24.10.2016, under Sections 406, 498-A of IPC, registered at Police Station Mehal Kalan, District Barnala. The petitioner wants to come to India to face trial.

3.

Notice of motion.

PARAMJIT KAUR SAINI 2024.05.31 02:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CWP No.13866 of 2024 -24.

Mr. K.K.Jund, Senior Panel Counsel for Union of India and Mr. Aman Dhir, DAG, Punjab, who on advance notice are present in Court, accept notice and waive service.

5.

With the consent of both sides, the petition is taken up for final disposal today itself.

6.

Mr. K.K.Jund, Senior Panel Counsel for Union of India, submits that passport cannot be issued to the petitioner, however, emergency certificate/travel document would be issued within two weeks from the date of application.

7.

Counsel for the petitioner agrees to the aforesaid arrangement. 8.

In the wake of statement of both sides, the petition stands disposed of.

(JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE 31.05.2024 paramjit Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes Whether reportable:

No PARAMJIT KAUR SAINI 2024.05.31 02:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document