Parvesh Sharma v. Ut Of Chandigarh And ANR.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH 270(1) CRM-M-9579-2018 (O&M) Date of Decision: 09.11.2022 Parvesh Sharma ......... Petitioner

Versus

Union Territory, Chandigarh and another ......... Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA Present:- None for the petitioner.

Mr. Rajeev Anand, APP, for the respondent-U.T. Mr. Amandeep Singh, Advocate for Mr. K.P.S. Dhillon, Advocate for respondent No.2/complainant.

**** ANOOP CHITKARA, J. (ORAL) On 24.01.2020 i.e. prior to Covid Pandemic, none had appeared on behalf of the petitioner. After that on 29.10.2022, again none had appeared on behalf of the petitioner and it was clarified that in case the petitioner is remain unrepresented on the next date of hearing, this Court shall presume that petitioner is not interested in pressing the matter and this Court shall dismiss the matter for non-prosecution. Even today, none has appeared on his behalf. As such, it appears that the petitioner is no more interested to pursue the present petition.

Given above, the present petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. All pending applications, if any, stand disposed of. (ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE 09.11.2022 Jyoti-II Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No JYOTI 2022.11.10 09:51 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document