← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/33854/2021allowed

Mohit v. State Of Haryana

2021-12-17Mrs. Justice Meenakshi I. Mehta2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH Sr. No.213 CRM-M No.33854 of 2021 Date of decision: 17.12.2021 Mohit ..Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana ..Respondent BEFORE: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA

Present:

Mr. Pradeep Chhoker , Advocate for the petitioner.

Ms. Ambika Sood, Addl.A.G., Haryana for the respondent -State.

*** MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA J. (Oral) The petitioner herein seeks the relief of regular bail in the criminal case arising out of the FIR bearing No.185 dated 29.05.2020 registered at Police Station Chandhut, District Palwal, Haryana, under Sections 323, 325, 506 read with Section 34 IPC and Section 3 (2) (va) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, with the allegations that he and his co-accused abused the complainant-informant named Vijay Singh and caused injuries to him with weapons like iron rod and danda (thick stick). Reply, filed on behalf of the respondent-State, by way of the affidavit of Deputy Superintendent of Police, Palwal, District Palwal, along-with Annexure R-1, is already available on the file and these documents are taken on the record.

POOJA SHARMA 2021.12.17 15:47 I attest to the accuracy of this document

CRM-M No.33854 of 2021 -2I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned State counsel in the instant petition and have also perused the file thoroughly.

Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner is behind the bars in this case since 27.07.2021 and his custodial interrogation is not required as the Challan has already been presented in the Court and in these circumstances, he (petitioner) deserves the relief as prayed for in this petition.

Learned State counsel does not dispute the afore-referred factual position.

Keeping in view the above-discussed facts and circumstances as well as the fact that the trial of the case is likely to take sufficient time to conclude and without commenting or expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the petitioner named Mohit is ordered to be released on regular bail subject to his furnishing the requisite personal and surety bonds to the satisfaction of learned trial Court/Chief Judicial Magistrate/Duty Magistrate concerned.

The petition in hand stands allowed accordingly. 17.12.2021 (MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA) pooja JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether Reportable No POOJA SHARMA 2021.12.17 15:47 I attest to the accuracy of this document