Neeraj And Others v. State Of Haryana And Another

CRM-M-28845-2023 (O&M) 2023:PHHC:121348

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

CRM-M-28845-2023 (O&M) Date of decision: 14.09.2023 Neeraj and others

...Petitioners

VS State of Haryana and another

...Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MONGA Present:- Mr.Vishal Sharda, Advocate, for the petitioners.

 

    Mr.Vishal Jassal, Advocate for Mr.Saurabh Sharma, Advocate, for respondent no.2.

***** ARUN MONGA, J. (ORAL) Petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.175 dated 12.03.2022 (Annexure P-1) registered under Sections 323, 379, 452, 506 and 34 of the IPC, at Police Station Thanesar Sadar, District Kurukshetra, and all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise dated 08.05.2023 (Annexures P-2). 2.

Since quashing was sought on the basis of compromise, a co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 01.06.2023 had directed the private parties to appear before the Illaqa Magistrate/trial Court for recording their statements in support of the compromise. A veracity report was also called for. 3.

Report dated 15.07.2023 of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kurukshetra, had been received. Report reveals that statements of complainant party i.e. respondent no.2 as also of accused/present petitioners herein, were duly recorded. It is opined that a compromise has been arrived at without any pressure, undue influence or coercion. The report is accompanied by the statements of parties. It is apparent that the complainant/respondent no.2 and accused/petitioners have arrived at a compromise voluntarily and without any coercion.

DHARAM VIR 2023.09.16 16:08 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgement.

CRM-M-28845-2023 (O&M) 2023:PHHC:121348 4.

Learned counsel for complainant/respondent no.2 states that he would have no objection to the quashing of FIR in question. 5.

This Court in appropriate cases can exercise the power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing of criminal proceedings/FIR on the basis of compromise. A reference in this regard may be made to a decision dated 29.09.2021 of the Supreme Court in case titled "Ramgopal and anr. V. The State of Madhya Pradesh"1 and a Full Bench decision of this Court in "Kulwinder Singh and others V. State of Punjab and others"2 . 6.

In the premise it is an appropriate case for exercise of power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. and to bring to an end the criminal proceedings initiated in the light of impugned FIR.

7.

Petition is thus allowed. FIR No.175 dated 12.03.2022 (Annexure P-1) registered under Sections 323, 379, 452, 506 and 34 of the IPC, at Police Station Thanesar Sadar, District Kurukshetra, and all proceedings emanating there from qua the petitioners stand quashed.

8.

Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (ARUN MONGA) JUDGE 14.09.2023 'D'Vir Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes/No Whether reportable:

Yes/No 1Criminal Appeal No.1489 of 2012 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 DHARAM VIR 2023.09.16 16:08 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgement.