Dharampal Singh v. Vice Chancellor And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CWP-10839-2015 Date of decision: - 10.09.2019 Dharampal Singh ....Petitioner

Versus

Vice Chancellor and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI Present: - Mr. Ajay Chhikara, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Vinod S. Bhardwaj, Advocate for respondents No.1 to 3.

Ms. Safia Gupta, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana for respondent No.4.

*** HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI , J. (ORAL) Counsel for the petitioner argues that the claim of the petitioner for the grant of reimbursement though initially was rejected, but subsequently the same has been allowed partially. Counsel for respondents No.1 to 3 states that whatever the petitioner was entitled for under the policy, have already been given to him.

Counsel for the petitioner prays that he may be allowed to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to the petitioner to challenge the policy, if need so arises.

Dismissed as withdrawn, with the liberty, as prayed for. ( HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI ) September 10, 2019 JUDGE naresh.k Whether reasoned/speaking?

No Whether reportable?

No NARESH KUMAR 2019.09.12 12:00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh