Sajjan Kumar v. Financial Commissioner Revenue Hry & ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CWP No.11553 of 2014 Date of decision: 11.04.2016 Sajjan Kumar ....Petitioner

Versus

Financial Commissioner, Revenue, Haryana and others ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PARAMJEET SINGH DHALIWAL 1) Whether Reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?

2) To be referred to the Reporters or not ?

3) Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? Present: - Mr. M.K. Verma, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Rajneesh Chadwal, DAG, Haryana.

PARAMJEET SINGH DHALIWAL, J. (ORAL) After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he wants to withdraw the present petition, however, it may be clarified that this is only for the limited purpose of mutation and ultimate rights shall be determined in appropriate proceedings because mutation is a summary proceeding. Mutation does not confer any title and is only for the purpose of updating the revenue record. Dismissed as withdrawn with aforesaid clarification. (Paramjeet Singh Dhaliwal) Judge April 11, 2016 R.S.

RAVINDER SINGH 2016.04.12 17:38 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document