High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRR/3579/2017dismissed

Tarun Kumar @ Nannu v. State Of Punjab

2018-12-11Mrs Justice Daya Chaudhary1 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRR-3579 of 2017 (O&M) Date of Decision: 11.12.2018 Tarun Kumar alias Nannu ....Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab ....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMENDRA JAIN Present:- Mr. N.S. Mahal, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Harpreet Multani, AAG, Punjab.

Mr. Pradeep Sharma, Advocate, for the complainant. RAMENDRA JAIN, J. (ORAL) Learned counsel has filed vakalatnama on behalf of the complainant on his own, though he has not been impleaded party. The same is taken on record.

Learned counsel for the petitioner prays that he may be allowed to withdraw this revision with liberty to file fresh one with better particulars.

Dismissed as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty. (RAMENDRA JAIN) December 11, 2018 JUDGE R.S.

Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No RAVINDER SINGH 2018.12.17 12:03 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document