← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCWP/1095/2015disposed of

Hari Singh Saini v. State Of Haryana And ORS.

2015-01-22Mr. Justice T.H.B. Chalapathi2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No. 1095 of 2015 Date of Decision: 22.1.2015 Hari Singh Saini .....Petitioner Vs.

State of Haryana and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESHWAR SINGH MALIK Present : Mr. Sudhir Hooda, Advocate for the petitioner.

**** RAMESHWAR SINGH MALIK J. (ORAL) Feeling aggrieved against the alleged inaction on the part of respondent authorities, petitioner has approached this Court, by way of instant writ petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ in the nature of Certiorari/Mandamus. Learned counsel for the petitioner, at the very outset, fairly states that he does not intend to press this writ petition qua the writ of Certiorari, for the time being. He further submits that given an opportunity, petitioner shall approach the competent authority, i.e. the Director, Fire Services, Haryana-respondent No.2 by moving an appropriate representation within a period of four weeks from today and he may be directed to consider and decide the same, within a reasonable time.

AMIT KUMAR 2015.01.23 09:52 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document

Civil Writ Petition No. 1095 of 2015 Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, lest it should prejudice the rights of either of the parties, the Director, Fire Services, Haryana-respondent No.2 is directed that if the petitioner approaches him by moving an appropriate representation within a period of four weeks from today, he shall consider and decide the same at an early date by passing an appropriate order thereon, strictly in accordance with law, but in any case within a period of one month from the date of receipt of representation from the petitioner. It is further directed that while considering and deciding the representation of the petitioner, respondent No.2 shall keep in mind the relevant policy instructions issued by the State. With the abovesaid observations made and directions issued, present petition stands disposed of.

(RAMESHWAR SINGH MALIK) JUDGE 22.1.2015 Ak Sharma AMIT KUMAR 2015.01.23 09:52 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document