Rajinder Singh @ Rimpa v. State Of Punjab


  


 
  
 

  

$'(
)*
+(,-.-)/    


 

 



  
 

 

  
 
 

    

 


   


  !

"#$%&


%
$
$  

 
& '"
#"
! 
()
&  

!# 
! 
 !! 
  
&
 #'
 '
 
  

""
) ( 
  "
#"
! 
  

  




 
&
 ! 
 

*' 
! 
+* *
!  "
#$  




3''  
  

$
$ $  



'
-  ,#"
- &#''

 "

.$ $' 
&' "
/# 
#$ .$' 

$' 

"

"
  
 



4"
#'
&

$   
""

$  
 

&''

.$' "


$
 
"
$ "
&
 
&  #'
 '
 
&''-  #"
0
 $  




."
 

  $  


#"

&
'
 

  

"- 
'
"
'
 "
"


1'1"
 
 

 1  '
- ''
 
#&&  
 . 

'#"
"

&# &#'

'
$#$ 
-#'"

1"
 $ 
 .
 "

(

 
&
. 



5
6!
5'- 
3""  '
3+
*#/
-

$
 2#
$ $"
 

'&
&
$ ",!
"
$$"
 
 
 &
 #'
 '


$  
- - '
#.  


$ 
$  
 

'"

.$' 
"
"

"# 


1  

"

"


 1"


7
8#
$"

2#


-
$  
#"
 '' "
1 1"
"


- "-

.

. 
!
#'
$' "
   1



9"
#$   

 %       7.

   

          "

&


  &   '! "

                 !

rial is likely take sufficient tim
"

&

me to conclude and as such, no o fruitful purpo ose would be served by keepin ng him in custody for indefinite e period.

8.

Concession of bail cannot be denied just as a measure of f punishment a as culpability is to be decided b by trial Court after appreciating g evidence add duced by the parties, and it i is a trite principle of criminal l jurisprudence e that bail is rule, jail is an exce eption, this Court deems it a fit t case



 
&
 #'
 '
 

$  
"

 #             $%%)0(+ #  & 

  &      ( & &        )*  )  +  

',  . &  &   

 

  " 
 &

$1!
! 
 -       /  - $)0 12-).3
/  0 &12-).3 3