Mohd. Kaif v. State Of Haryana
!"
"#$%$ & '
('
) * ' + + +
!
+ + , ' -. /0 # ! $
%&' (
( "
) )*
+,-#%.
#/012020
&013&% , ( )
)4
- 2 , 4
"
*
4 " "
44 " 4 4 & +, " 4) * 5" * ) + !
4 ) )
4 #062 #/012020
* 200 )
""
*) ) "4
! 4 * )
* $ " *
4
" )) )
4 *
4 4 "5
4 4
)
5 " ) + "
"
4 ) ) 4 ) )(
) 4 " 4 )
)
4 "
4
"
4 ""
70/012020 )
5 )
"
4 " 45
"4 44
* 200
" ) 4
* 45
) 4 ""
"
4
) ) 8 5 "
4
) 4) )4 4 4
, *
+, #1012020
"
) "* " ) )4 4 *
"
)
5
%
*"
"0'0.20204 " & &
4 #%
*
$" *"
5 ) ) 4 4 4*
""
*
* 4*
4
) 4 4
* *"
9
:)"
Hon'ble ( 1 %23$. +$&42 5".%6% +! !"
6&7 8 #''.;%<((2'#
4 )
* 4* )
(
%2$3 9 %$3 163 . . & !2 2 !! #2 .: 9 %$3 .$& !2 2 !! #2 .: 9 %""3 163 .
2 !! #2 .: 5".%6% !$ & / &5"%!$4 !$ & 4"&#:
;( " -;<#=2= 202# ) 9
;( " <-;<1/=/ 202#<
(
,
"
*
) = 7
)
)
" & * 4
#%
*
$"
) ) *"
4
*
"5 )
) " "
"* )
) 4 *
* " )
; " *4 * :4 *
"
) *"
*
* )"
"* ) )
4
*
*
4 * " "5 "
)
* ) ) *
1 ! ) *
$ "
"*
)
)
*
*
*
" "
"*
*
"" )
)
" * :
" "
"*
7.
I have heard learned counsel for the parties. 8.
Although the petitioner has already faced incarceration for almost 3 years but as per learned counsel for the parties, three prosecution witnesses out of 18 have already been examined. As per the facts and circumstances and the allegations contained in the FIR, the strong apprehension expressed by learned State counsel as well as by learned counsel for the complainant, cannot be ignored and does carry weight.
9.
The judgments relied upon by learned counsel for the petitioner as aforesaid are distinguishable on facts. The Hon'ble (
;<4 )4 4 *
>* )( 4 4 Hon'ble
( )
9 4"
" 5 )
) 9 * 4)
:)"
*
;<
) *
4 )
"
) 4
)
4
4
*
$" "
)
")
)
$ *
) * 10.
Therefore, considering the gravity and magnitude of the allegations involved in the present case and considering the aforesaid totality of facts and circumstances, this (
"
)
Consequently, finding no merit in the present petition, the same is dismissed. ## 4
)*
*
$ "
"
- + + 0 6/:
, 8
5 ) ?
3- 8
*
?
3-