Beg Raj v. State Of Haryana And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH CWP No.10370 of 2016 Date of Decision:- 24.05.2016 Beg Raj ....Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana and others ....Respondents
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI
Present:
Mr. Sandeep Kumar Yadav, Advocate, for the petitioner.
**** RITU BAHRI, J. (Oral) Petitioner is seeking directions to the respondents to release the retiral benefits as well as ACP scales along with interest. In this regard, he has given a legal notice dated 03.03.2016 (Annexure P-2) to the respondent(s) but no decision has been taken thereon. Learned counsel for the petitioner states, that at this stage, the petitioner will be satisfied, if directions are issued to the respondent(s) to decide the legal notice dated 03.03.2016 (Annexure P-2), referred to above. In view of above, without commenting on the merits of the case, this petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent(s) to decide the legal notice dated 03.03.2016 (Annexure P-2), within a period of three months, by passing a speaking order, in accordance with law. May 24, 2016 ( RITU BAHRI ) naresh.k JUDGE NARESH KUMAR 2016.05.27 15:34 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh