Dinesh Kumar & ANR v. State Of Haryana & ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CWP No. 12013 of 2014 Decided on : 19.05.2015 Dinesh Kumar and another . . . Petitioners

Versus

State of Haryana and others . . . Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE REKHA MITTAL PRESENT: Mr. Sanjay Vashisth, Advocate for the petitioners.

Ms. Palika Monga, DAG, Haryana.

Mr. Ajay Nara, Advocate for respondents No.7 & 8.

Mr. Mukesh Kumar Verma, Advocate for respondent No.9.

**** AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J. (Oral) The petitioners have challenged the acquisition of land bearing Khasra No.31//22/4, masuring 4 Kanal 9 Marla, falling in the revenue estate of village Kalaka, Tehsil and District Rewari. 2.

In the short reply filed by Sh. Satyabir Singh, Land Acquisition Collector, Gurgaon, on behalf of respondent No.6, wherein, in para Nos. 3 & 4, it has ben stated as under:- "3.

That the constructed area petitioners in the land bearing Khasra No. 31//22/4(4-9) measuring 4 Kanal 9 Marla has already been released by the competent authority vide instruction issued in letter no. 12/13/2013-3TCP, Dated 7.11.2014.

JAWALA RAM 2015.05.21 14:47 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh

CWP No. 12013 of 2014 - 2 - 4.

That the petitioners have no grievance at all by the present acquisition proceedings because the constructed area has already released by the competent authority. The present Civil Writ Petition filed by the petitioners is liable to be dismissed, being infructuous." 3.

In view of the above, learned counsel for the petitioners states that the instant writ petition has become infructuous and may be disposed of as such.

4.

Ordered accordingly.

(AJAY KUMAR MITTAL) JUDGE (REKHA MITTAL) May 19, 2015 JUDGE J.Ram JAWALA RAM 2015.05.21 14:47 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh