Ramesh Kumar v. State Of Haryana And ORS

I N THE HI GH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDI GARH CWP- 10390- 2016 Dat e of deci si on: - 24. 05. 2016 Ramesh Kumar . . . Pet i t i oner Ver sus St at e of Har yana and ot her s . . . Respondent s CORAM: HON' BLE MR. JUSTI CE S. J. VAZI FDAR, ACTI NG CHI EF JUSTI CE HON' BLE MR. JUSTI CE ARUN PALLI Pr esent : - Mr . Di wan S. Adl akha, Advocat e, f or t he pet i t i oner .

* * * * S. J. VAZI FDAR, A. C. J. ( ORAL) By t he i mpugned l et t er dat ed

02. 02. 2015, t he r espondent s have demanded an amount of ` 18, 24, 086/ - whi ch i ncl uded i nt er est t i l l 31. 12. 2014. 2.

The pet i t i oner was advi sed t o pay t he same f ai l i ng whi ch t he r espondent s st at ed t hat pr oceedi ngs f or r esumpt i on woul d be i ni t i at ed. The pet i t i oner has not even r esponded t o t hi s l et t er t o dat e. He has nei t her made payment as demanded, nor r epl i ed t o t he l et t er . Ther e i s no war r ant f or i nt er f er i ng i n t he wr i t j ur i sdi ct i on at t hi s st age. The pet i t i oner i s al ways at l i ber t y t o r epl y t o t he l et t er dat ed 02. 02. 2015 and r ai se al l hi s cont ent i ons.

3.

The wr i t pet i t i on i s accor di ngl y di sposed of . ( S. J. VAZI FDAR) ACTI NG CHI EF JUSTI CE ( ARUN PALLI ) JUDGE

24. 05. 2016 Amodh AMODH SHARMA 2016.05.24 17:19 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh