Satbir Kaur v. State Of Ut Chandigarh
!"
"
%#
&$ ' '
( #!&#)
!
'%
*&##*
! !"
" + $" #"
!&#)
!
" #,)# -, " % ! " % . " / %
, */ # " %) 01 ! % 23 455!#
#
!"
)$$ #
*
!
"
"! **$$ " "''% "
* # %) 0 # - "3 6 5 ! " **7$ # "
# % # , " "Case heard via video conferencing.
Pursuant to the last order passed, a short affidavit of the ASP, Sub Division South, UT, Chandigarh, dated 6.9.2021, has been filed, which is ordered to be taken on record. Mr.P.S.Paul, learned Addl.PP, UT, Chandigarh, points to paragraphs 3, 4 and 7 of the affidavit to submit that the petitioner had fullknowledge of the earlier sale agreement entered into by her mother with one Jagdish, and thereafter with the complainant in the present FIR, i.e.Partap Chauhan, but thereafter she still entered into an agreement of sale with one Mainpal son of Atma Ram, qua the same property. Upon specific query put to him by this court, he also submits that the petitioner has also executed an affidavit to the effect that the money had been accepted by her mother for the sale of the property in question to Partap Chauhan, despite which thereafter, she along with her mother and siblings,
! entered into an agreement of sale qua the same property with Mainpal.
Adjourned to 27.9.2021.
The ASP would file another affidavit, annexing therewith a copy of the affidavit stated to have been executed by the petitioner, dated 15.12.2020, as also the subsequent agreement of sale entered into with Mainpal. It is made clear that at this stage, there is no interim order operating in favour of the petitioner.
It is to be noticed however that learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner has not received a single penny out of the money alleged to have been receive by her mother.
Having considered even that argument, once the specific stand of the investigating agency is that the petitioner first executed an affidavit admitting that her mother had received money for the same property (of which the petitioner is also a co-owner), and thereafter entered into an agreement to sell that property to some other person, in my opinion no interim order needs to be passed in favour of the petitioner at this stage."
& " # ) "
)$*#, "& ! )
"! "
"! #
# ! 7 #,
. # 5 !
7 " * "
)$ $"
#8 ' !
$
"
###!7 " **,"
)$' %
*" $ # ,9:, # , "
)$ #8 # * " # $"
*
* " ' *.
" #
*; # ,"% " % $ %" <
# ) '
# " #"
)$
$' *7 :%# ";!(
! 1! 7 " " #
=
" * ## **,=# 1!
7 " "= ##' ' ' **
!
"7)! "' 7"*! ", * $' *#
# 5 7 " % *! " '%% ,! " 7""
!"!
",)#<* ." / . ' /!)#) "> #,
%!) " $" 7 ".7*#$ # "
#
","
# #, $' *7
% "
3
" % **, % " # ) #
#
:&= 07 " #%*, "& ;!7"" =
#, "*!
$ "
"
"' ""
#*# " #%% ,
%"
#"
# * )# ** # *% ,' " '! #"7 *#"
)8
" #%% ,$ # " ' "% "
:
% "
; ? #&##* ! " '
!#% )$'%* .7*#$ " $' * * 7
%"
! ** " $' " '%% , 7 "% # % #:) " $"%*, " $""' ";!
" '<* ."'
% " $"* # * "
)"' *, $ #
7 *, $
"" "' "!"7)!7"
" ) *, )*. "
" % ,7""
.$ #'
# / %
, */ # " # '
!37 *# #' " " * ? # * "
* '
#
% 7**$
*
7
!!
3
7!7 "% "
)$'
#%#$ % ' # "
*! #7 "* #&##*( #$!"
"!
)$#'# '* % 1
!' ' "
$! "7 , " !"7 *#"
) #, ''%'7 "% > *,#'# -
'
,!
**,! **)
'
# "# *#% #! *, " % *# # %) 01 " ! #) $
7 *# %)#$
"# '()*+) &"&%
dharamvir// JUDGE @" "% .$A # BC @" "%
* BC