Raj Rani v. Union Of India & ORS.



  



IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No. 

  

Date of Decision : 28.05.2015 Smt.Raj Rani ...... Petitioner versus The Union of India & others ...... Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI *** Present :

Mr. Mandeep K. Saajan, Advocate for the petitioner.

***

1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

2. To be referred to the Reporters or not?

3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? AJAY TEWARI, J. (ORAL) The claim in the present petition is for the grant of fixed medical allowance.

Learned counsel states that in this connection the petitioner has got issued Legal Notice dated 05.03.2015 (Annexure P-5) and that she would be satisfied at this stage if in the first instance a direction is issued to the respondent No.2 to decide the same by passing a speaking order thereon within any reasonable time.

I find this to be a fair request.

Without commenting to the merits of the case, the POOJA SHARMA 2015.06.17 15:26 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh



  


respondent No.2 is directed to decide the said legal notice by passing a speaking order thereon within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order.

Petition stands disposed of in the above terms. Since the main case has been decided, the pending civil miscellaneous application, if any, also stands disposed of. ( AJAY TEWARI ) 28.05.2015 JUDGE Pooja Sharma-I POOJA SHARMA 2015.06.17 15:26 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh